Description

cm 17 x 24, xxiv-244 pp. con 9 figg. n.t. Biblioteca di ?Galilaeana? 6 Questo studio analizza la profonda influenza di Galileo sulla filosofia di Hobbes, anche attraverso la mediazione di Mersenne. Del ?galileismo? hobbesiano, l?autore mette in luce i molteplici aspetti: metodologici ed epistemologici, ma anche le analogie concettuali e lessicali nel campo della fisica, per giungere a un confronto tra i due autori sul tema della struttura della materia, dal quale emerge una comune concezione meccanicista dell?universo. This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analogies in the field of physics, to arrive at a comparison between the two authors on the subject of the structure of matter, revealing a common mechanistic conception of the universe.This study analyses the profound influence that Galileo had on Hobbes?s philosophy, also through the mediation of Mersenne. The author highlights the many aspects of Hobbesian ?Galileism?: not only methodological and epistemological ones, but also conceptual and lexical analo